Post by brassmonkey on Sept 6, 2009 10:33:24 GMT -5
I guess I'm a 9/11 Truther.. Don't you just love how people have to give everyone they disagree with a cute pet name, like Birther, or Truther. I suppose I'm guilty of the same thing, but it's annoying, nontheless.
Anyone who has taken the time to watch the documentary Loose Change, have heard the questions asked and seen the facts discussed, but whenever you bring up an alternate happening on 9/11, people just call you a kook and shut down the conversation.. Okay, it's obvious that planes were flown into the Twin Towers, but where was there not one piece of plane debris recovered an Shanksville, PA, not one body, and not one body recovered at the Pentagon...
One fact that really got me in the documentary is this-they told us that a plane hit the Pentagon.. However, the government immediately went around to all the businesses with a camera pointing in that direction and confiscated the footage of that time. Okay, maybe they wanted to analyze the footage, but the fact is that they had no right to confiscate private property in the first place.. We'll get back to that later..
Anyway, so a plane hit the side of the Pentagon that was fortified against a bomb attack... So why is the damage to the Pentagon absolutely inconsistent with a plane hitting it? There is no damage fromt he wings-you know, where the fuel is stored!! And the biggest curious thing is that there are no holes where the engines would have hit the building? The engines weighed several tons each, and they were the heaviest part of the plane, but the windows aren't even broken where the engines would have hit.. The only damage to the outer wall is a single hole, no more than 16 feet in diameter.
Here's a photo from the documentary with the profile of a Boeing 757 superimposed over it to show where the engines and tail section would have likely hit..
So were're supposed to believe that two engines, each weighing 6 tons, slammed into the Pentagon at 530 mph, but left no visible damage?
And we're also supposed to believe that the 757 smashed through 9 feet of steel-reinforced concrete, traveling 310 feet inside the Pentagon to penetrate the C ring and leave another 16-foot hole when the nose of a Boeing 757 is made carbon-fiber....
And there is also no plane debris, except for one large object they expect us to believe was the cockpit that was carried away under a tarp... There is no wing sections, tail section and not one body was recovered... This is the first time in history that a plane has hit a building and completely vaporized itself and all of its passengers...
Anyone who has taken the time to watch the documentary Loose Change, have heard the questions asked and seen the facts discussed, but whenever you bring up an alternate happening on 9/11, people just call you a kook and shut down the conversation.. Okay, it's obvious that planes were flown into the Twin Towers, but where was there not one piece of plane debris recovered an Shanksville, PA, not one body, and not one body recovered at the Pentagon...
One fact that really got me in the documentary is this-they told us that a plane hit the Pentagon.. However, the government immediately went around to all the businesses with a camera pointing in that direction and confiscated the footage of that time. Okay, maybe they wanted to analyze the footage, but the fact is that they had no right to confiscate private property in the first place.. We'll get back to that later..
Anyway, so a plane hit the side of the Pentagon that was fortified against a bomb attack... So why is the damage to the Pentagon absolutely inconsistent with a plane hitting it? There is no damage fromt he wings-you know, where the fuel is stored!! And the biggest curious thing is that there are no holes where the engines would have hit the building? The engines weighed several tons each, and they were the heaviest part of the plane, but the windows aren't even broken where the engines would have hit.. The only damage to the outer wall is a single hole, no more than 16 feet in diameter.
Here's a photo from the documentary with the profile of a Boeing 757 superimposed over it to show where the engines and tail section would have likely hit..
So were're supposed to believe that two engines, each weighing 6 tons, slammed into the Pentagon at 530 mph, but left no visible damage?
And we're also supposed to believe that the 757 smashed through 9 feet of steel-reinforced concrete, traveling 310 feet inside the Pentagon to penetrate the C ring and leave another 16-foot hole when the nose of a Boeing 757 is made carbon-fiber....
And there is also no plane debris, except for one large object they expect us to believe was the cockpit that was carried away under a tarp... There is no wing sections, tail section and not one body was recovered... This is the first time in history that a plane has hit a building and completely vaporized itself and all of its passengers...
